Journal article
Science Advances, 2026
APA
Click to copy
Paltiel, Y., Goldberg, D., Yuran, N., Yochelis, S., Soh, J. H., Seibel, C., … Naaman, R. (2026). Dynamic breaking of mirror symmetry in spin-dependent electron transport through chiral media causes enantiomeric excesses. Science Advances.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Paltiel, Y., D. Goldberg, Nir Yuran, S. Yochelis, Jia Hao Soh, C. Seibel, J. Gauss, et al. “Dynamic Breaking of Mirror Symmetry in Spin-Dependent Electron Transport through Chiral Media Causes Enantiomeric Excesses.” Science Advances (2026).
MLA
Click to copy
Paltiel, Y., et al. “Dynamic Breaking of Mirror Symmetry in Spin-Dependent Electron Transport through Chiral Media Causes Enantiomeric Excesses.” Science Advances, 2026.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{y2026a,
title = {Dynamic breaking of mirror symmetry in spin-dependent electron transport through chiral media causes enantiomeric excesses},
year = {2026},
journal = {Science Advances},
author = {Paltiel, Y. and Goldberg, D. and Yuran, Nir and Yochelis, S. and Soh, Jia Hao and Seibel, C. and Gauss, J. and Zilberg, S. and Ozturk, S. and Fransson, J. and Krylov, Anna I. and Naaman, R.}
}
Two fundamental questions have puzzled scientists for more than 150 years. “How did life become homochiral?” and “why was this specific handedness selected?” Recently, it has been shown that homochirality could have emerged through the enantioselective interactions of molecules with magnetic substrates due to the asymmetric crystallization of an RNA precursor on a magnetite substrate, abundant on early Earth. This phenomenon is based on the chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS) effect. Despite its robustness, this model could not provide an answer to the second question: Why one specific handedness (D for RNA) was selected. Here, we demonstrate that spin-involving processes can have different outcomes in the two enantiomers of chiral molecules. In chiral molecules with unpaired electrons or while electrons are passing through them, the total angular momentum vector, J, is aligned along the “easy axis,” which is defined by the magnetic anisotropy induced by the spin-orbit coupling and asymmetry of the molecular field. The magnitude J is the same for both enantiomers, but the vectors may be aligned differently relative to the molecular frame in the two enantiomers. This difference can be quantified by, for example, by the angle between J and electric dipole moment of the molecule, μ. We show by direct measurements, theory, and ab initio calculations that dynamic spin processes in chiral molecules could result in different efficiencies of spin-related phenomena, including the interaction of chiral molecules with magnetic surfaces. The findings may provide an explanation for the specific homochirality in nature.